Find MC on Facebook

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 18 other subscribers

PoliceOne.com News

Peace Officers For Christ

Peace Officers For Christ

Twitter Machine

First Responders Network

FRN Affiliate

Hey, Gramma, send me your money!

May 31, 2010 Training 3 Comments

Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve handled a couple of fraud details in which the victims were in their 80s. Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m a believer in respecting one’s elders and I know they are the “greatest generation” and all, but a larger group of gullible folks doesn’t exist. Here’s the scenario.

Gramma Moses gets a phone call from her “grandson”. GM says it sounded just like him (although he was crying). “Grandson” tells GM he is in county lockup in Buffalo, NY. Seems he and some buddies got picked up at the border coming back from Canada with a little Canadian Hippie Lettuce (credit: Bitterman) and now he needs some money for bail.
GM sends her long-suffering husband, Rumple-freaking-Stilskein, out straight away to the closest Western Union to send “Grandson” about $2800. After Rumple returns, another phone call. Seems that wasn’t enough money and “Grandson” forgot to mention he needed additional money for lawyer fees as well.
Well, family is family, right? Yup, Rumple goes back out and sends $2900. The following morning, one more phone call greets our intrepid elderly couple and $2500 more is sent. Did I forget to mention where they sent the money? Shame on me….Dublin, Ireland.
Now, I know I’m just a traffic dork and not super detective guy, but if “Grandson” is in the clink in Buffalo, NY, how is sending three large payments out of the country supposed to help out your deserving (*cough*) “Grandson”. Here’s another question…why not attempt to confirm the person is indeed your relation?
As it turns out, GM called “Grandson’s” cell phone, but he never answered. A few days later, they saw their Grandson, but no one brought up the money or the trip to jail. A couple days after that, they finally called him and asked him about his arrest in NY. Shockingly, he had no bloody clue what they were talking about. So, they’re out $8200. There’s no way to track the money, other than it got picked up in Ireland.
They even used cash, so there’s no protection for them there, either.
Here’s another example…I got a call from a nice old lady I’ll call Betty. Betty was ever so excited that she won a sweepstakes, but she felt a little hesitant because the person that told her of her winnings asked her to be at home at a specific time and have a check written for $450. Betty went on to explain she enters all kinds of sweepstakes and has never won so she didn’t know if this was sketchy or not.
Oh, and in order to enter the sweepstakes she had to send them a voided check. Gee, sketchy, you think? She was told her $450 would be refunded on top of the $2.5 million she won. *wink, wink*.
Her grandson (real one) got on the phone and he and I had a nice conversation about how Bettie needs to stop entering bullshit sweepstakes and how if she didn’t she’d make a excellent victim of a myriad of crimes.
I went to her house at the time the “sweepstakes” rep was supposed to show. Can you believe he never showed up? Crazy, right?
So, do me a favor, and have your grandparents over for a nice dinner and tell them how much you love and appreciate all the sacrifices they made for you and yours. Then tell them they’re suckers if they send off their money on what amounts to a whim or just a straight out scam. And tell them the seventeen emails they get everyday about how some Nigerian prince wants to send them $45,000,000.00, but needs $700.00 from you to pay his taxes is bullshit. And say, “bullshit” to them…it’ll get their attention.
You’ve been educated…carry on.

A Little International Flavor

May 29, 2010 Training 13 Comments

Earlier this month, I got an email with a link to the 12 coolest police cars in action. The majority of them are from Europe where, let’s be honest, they’ve got some ridiculous cars. To the best of my knowledge, your every day beat cop is driving a sub-compact, goofy looking car; however, they have high-performance pursuit cars as well. I’m gonna guess the lion’s share of this list fall into the latter category.

You can check out the list here.
My opinion on the list? So glad you asked. The first thing that stood out to me as I scrolled down the list was to wonder if Europeans have no sense of what colors go together. Was there a clearance sale on cheap day-glo paint? Holy shit…
On the other hand, if you throw me the keys to a Lamborghini Gallardo and it just happens to be bright fucking orange and blue…well, then you ain’t gonna see those keys for quite some time.
The second thing that stood out? What in the hell is what could quite possibly be the gayest car ever (if cars could have a sexual preference, that is) doing on this list of straight up bad ass, no shit, go faster than Flash cars?!? Really, Mini? Don’t try to be so butch. Driving this car as a police officer would be like me riding one of those electric trike pieces of shit because it’s “eco-friendly”. I wouldn’t take me seriously on that thing, why should you?
Lastly, I love that good old-fashioned American muscle made it to the top two. That car just looks mean. Which, in turn, means it will never drive the streets of the Town. We wouldn’t want folks to think we were mean, now.
Thanks for the email, Chris! I loved seeing police vehicle options from the world round!

Comedic Break

May 28, 2010 Training 5 Comments

This one made me laugh out loud. And to answer your questions, no, I am not the crusty old British wanker in the video. No offense if you are a crusty old British wanker, by the way.

Interesting, note…anyone see where the cop parked his bike in relation to the vehicle? What the hell?!? Maybe ‘cuz you Brits drive on the wrong side, this is SOP, but I’m gonna assume it’s just poor research on the director’s part and move on.

And lastly, credit where it’s due…thanks, Kyle for the link.

Top Shot

May 19, 2010 Training 5 Comments

I was recently contacted by the folks over at the History Channel about a new show they are putting on called “Top Shot”. From historychannel.com:

Whether it’s William Tell using a crossbow to shoot an apple off his son’s head, or Annie Oakley using a hand mirror to make a shot with a rifle slung over her shoulder, history is filled with legendary tales of amazing marksmanship. Now, HISTORY is tapping into these inspiring feats of sharp-shooting for its first-ever competition series, Top Shot, premiering Sunday, June 6 at 10/9c on HISTORY.

Sixteen of the nation’s most skilled marksmen have been carefully selected to compete for the title. Some have professional shooting experience, some are amateurs–and all will showcase breathtaking timing, speed and accuracy in their quest to win the $100,000 prize package and the title of “Top Shot.” The winner will ultimately have to be skilled in everything from muzzle-loading muskets and modern pistols to slingshots and throwing knives.

Each week, contenders will face both team and individual elimination challenges until one winner remains. Every challenge will focus on the weapons, technologies and techniques of different historical eras as hi-speed HD cameras capture the skillful execution of each test in extreme slow-motion.

Contestants vying for “Top Shot” include professional shooters–like the first woman in the history of the Chicago Police Department to become “Top Gun” of her graduating class–and world-record holders, but there are also amateurs like a Wild West entertainer, a historical firearms collector and a radio gun show host. From a 22-year-old rifle prodigy to a 47-year-old retired city cop, they’ll need skill, toughness and nerves of steel to claim the Top Shot title.

I think by now I’ve established myself as a bit of a TV lover, right? Check out the promotional video:
So fire up those DVRs, kids. This looks like a pretty cool show and I’ll definitely be tuning in! Guns, knives, assorted weapons and competition? Oh, hell yes, I’m in! The History Channel, in conjunction with XBOX (my other addiction), is also having two contests to promote “Top Shots”! The first is simply a sweepstakes (info here) in which you and a friend could travel to Los Angeles for a Microsoft game-related event. The second involves a little more skill (info here). Between June 4th at 0001 hrs and June 5th at 2359 hrs, fire up your XBOX and play a little Call of Duty – Modern Warfare 2 over XBOX Live. The best online players will be eligible for prizes like an HDTV, home theater system and an XBOX Elite. Remember to look for Motorcop on XBOX Live, as well!
Consider yourselves informed…

Tactical Pants

May 18, 2010 Training 9 Comments

I can totally see where you think I may be going with such a post title. Man, there are so many inappropriate, yet hilarious, comments to be made with that one. Alas, it is a real thing and there is a real need in Law Enforcement for them. Sound crazy? Well, okay, I think we can agree on that one.

A while back I did an interview with Jeannette over at her tactical pants blog. She emailed me recently and wanted to pass along their Ultimate Guide to Tactical Pants for my LEO readers…and, I suppose, those of you who feel you need to dress more, um, tactically?
I am stuck in my motor britches, so I don’t have much need for tactically driven pantaloons, but I’m sure there are those of you out there that may benefit from their product line. Check ‘em out here.

What Happened?

May 18, 2010 Training 15 Comments

By now, you all know me well enough to know that I can spin a yarn or two. Sure, I have a minor ability to make what may very well be a boring traffic-related story into something a little more entertaining when I include my inner dialog. That being said, though, you should also know that the basis behind the stories I tell you are factual. In other words, I’m not good enough to make this shit up. These stories involve your fellow man (gender neutral, of course).

Keep that in mind when you read the following. Earlier this month, I was dispatched to a pretty spectacular solo vehicle collision. Nothing particularly sexy about it, though. New teenage driver looking to make a lane change looked over her right shoulder. This seemingly innocuous move caused her to gently (and naturally) pulled the wheel to the left. Try it yourself (when safe, of course). If your left hand is on the wheel at around the 10 o’clock position, give a good head turn to the right and see if your hand doesn’t naturally pull the wheel counter clockwise. Her result? WHAM…right into a tree.
At any rate, my partner, DogBoy (our K9), and I were in the midst of the wreckage when a car headed in the opposite direction asked us, “What happened?”
I’m not kidding.
Really? What happened? Apparently, your observational skills suck on ice. Can you not see the complete destruction of what used to be a brand new Toyota Camry? Can you not see the tree seriously listing to one side?
Questions like this are so very irritating for a number of reasons. First, you look like a complete moron. It couldn’t be more obvious what happened, for crying out loud. Second, you’re a rubber necker. I f’n hate rubber neckers. You know what they cause? Other f’n collisions! Those LEOs that read this blog can attest to that very fact. Finally, asking a question like that makes you look like a complete moron.
Yes, I realize I said that one twice. Remember something, folks…they’re morons. They need to be reminded repeatedly. Repetition is key.
The best part of the story is my partner’s and my response to the question. What happened?
DogBoy: Plane Crash.
MC: Meteor Strike.
Even Fire laughed. Although the Capt. told us later the driver called us assholes. I’ll go ahead and chalk that up to it taking one to know one.

Seatbelt and the Vietnam Connection Episode II

May 17, 2010 Training 7 Comments

This guy took me to court today. Hilarity ensued.

I gave my usual cut and dried version of events on the day of the event. I usually leave out all the bullshit static the drivers tend to have because it has little or nothing to do with the violation. My opinions of the driver are not pertinent to what I am testifying to. Sure, the guy and/or girl could be the Duke of Douchebaggery, but it has jack to do with why the citation was written (although it is a lovely side benefit).
So, like I said, I gave my usual testimony. Now, the defendant has an opportunity to cross examine me. Joy…
PIG (Poorly Informed Guy…I know, awesome, right?): Officer, do you agree that you cited me for CVC 27315(d)?
MC: I believe I just testified to that very thing, sir.
PIG: And officer, do you agree that I was traveling on Main St.
MC: Yes.
PIG: Officer, do you agree that a “highway” is defined as a road that connects two towns or cities?
MC: Well, I’d have to refresh my memory of the vehicle code definition of a highway, but I’m pretty sure it means a roadway. I would like to point out that 27315(d) requires you to wear your seat belt on that roadway.
PIG: No further questions.
Judge: Statement?
PIG: Yes, your Honor. Vehicle code section 27315(d) says, “No person shall operate a motor vehicle on a highway unless that person and all passengers 16 years of age or over are properly restrained by a safety belt.” It is my contention that I was not driving upon a highway as Main St. does not, in fact, join to towns or cities. And that is why I am pleading not guilty.
**PIG had also handed both the Judge and I a stack of papers containing his main points.**
Judge: Sir, I don’t want to seem to be arguing with you, but where did you get your definition of a highway?
PIG: Webster’s Dictionary.
Judge: Again, sir, I’m not trying to argue with you; however, the vehicle code defines a highway as basically a road. I will take your case under submission so I can review the documentation you provided me.
Your old buddy MC had to stifle a chuckle at PIG’s last answer. Way to be prepared, wanna-be-lawyer-guy! The best part of the whole thing was that at no point did he offer up any defense as to why he wasn’t wearing the seat belt. Hell, he never said a damn thing about it one way or the other.
Now, I would’ve loved to have brought up his attitude at the stop. He was disrespectful and pompous. The fact of the matter is he was wrong…about a great many things. Bringing up his attitude in open court is neither professional or appropriate in my humble opinion. Besides, isn’t that what blogs are for?